Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/307/34 Guarantee, No evidence of murder of the parties available upon reaching an agreement and an affidavit for this statement in court Has been entered into which will compromise between the parties. Holding, there was a reasonable ground for a grant of bail The accused accepted the bail under the circumstances.

1987 M L D 2662

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

Sardar MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1438-B of 1986/BWP, decided on 6th October, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

--S.498--Bail, pre-arrest--Accused who allegedly fired at a person belonging to complainant party and caused simple injury contending that complainant party despite a stay order issued in favour of accused had forcibly carved out with tractor a pathway in lands of accused and got instant case registered in order to pressurise him and that Sessions Court while refusing pre-arrests bail to accused did no consider in true perspective facts and circumstances of case- Contentions raised requiring examination--Accused admitted to pre-arrest bail.

Malik Muhammad Aslam for Petitioner.

ORDER

This is a petition for the grant of pre-arrest bail moved or behalf of Muhammad Hussain Khan, a local Advocate, who allegedly fired at one Siddiq and caused simple hurt on his head. It is stated that the complainant party despite a stay-order issued in favour of the petitioner had forcibly carved out with tractor a pathway in the lands of the petitioner and in order to pressurise and prevent the; petitioner from objecting to the use of way illegally made on the land h of the petitioner, the instant case has been got registered. It is further contended that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge while requiring pre-arrest bail did not consider in true perspective the facts and circumstances of the case: The contention raised needs examination.

2. Admit. Notice.

3. Meanwhile the petitioner is admitted to interim pre-arrest bail till 15-10-1986 in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar of this Court. The s petitioner is however directed to join the investigation meanwhile.

M.Y.H./M-400/L Interim anticipatory bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Gujranwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.