Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 382 Bail, denied witnesses' testimony under oath by witnesses who needed further inquiry after the inquiry. Is.

1987 M L D 2657

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

MUHAMMAD DIN--Petitioner

versus

S.H.O. and others--Respondents

Writ Petition No.2053 of 1986, decided on 16th March, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---Ss.491 & 173--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Art.11--Habeas corpus--After discharge of an accused on a police report, police, held, was not competent to reopen case and summon him without orders of competent Court.

Awan Muhammad Hanif Khan for Petitioner.

Rao Hamid Mukhtar for Respondents.

ORDER

The facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that Qamar Abbas, the alleged detenu, was arrested in the case F.I.R. No.174/85 dated 13-3-1985 under Article 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 for the abduction of Mst. Iffat Parveen. After investigation no material was found against him and he was got discharged by the police on 27-4-1986. Later S.H.O., P.S. Township, Lahore again summoned him to the police station for joining the investigation.

On the application of the petitioner a bailiff was deputed to raid Police Station Township, Lahore for the recovery of Qamar Abbas the alleged detenu and at the time of raid he was found present in the premises of the police station. The S.H.O. informed the bailiff that he has called him to the police station in connection with investigation of-the aforesaid case.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after discharge of an accused on a police report the police is not competent to reopen the case without obtaining orders of the Magistrate which admittedly has not been done in the present case. The S.H.O. concedes this legal proposition and stated that Qamar Abbas shall not be summoned without obtaining orders of the competent Court.

3. In this view of the matter, the petitioner has no grievance. The S.H.O. shall inform the other investigating agencies about the statement made by him on this legal proposition. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.

4. However, the petitioner may pursue other available legal remedies against S.H.O., P.S. Township, Lahore or other persons at fault for the alleged illegal detention.

M. Y. H./M-397/L Petition disposed of.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Patoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.