Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad Definition of Evidence The Beneficiary of Suspicion The complainant and other witnesses were not residents of the village where the incident occurred and could not assign a valid reason for their presence at the relevant location. Four of the victim's children were between the ages of 4 and 17/18, but none of them was testified in the case. Nothing was on record to show that he was not in the house at the relevant time even though the deceased's children were minors, but he was the most natural witness to the incident, a natural and competent witness to the victim's husband, the witness. As was not presented by the prosecution, despite the fact that he was there a post mortem examination on the body of the deceased was conducted with a delay of 11 hours from the incident, saying the delay is indicative of the fact that The witnesses were not present. The prosecution based a false story on the use of time and the delay in the post-mortem examination of the victim at the time of the incident. And using false evidence of prosecution motions, as alleged by the prosecution, could not prove a positive report from the Pistol Recovery and the Franzic Science Laboratory, was a controversial piece of evidence, and was only relevant when the initial. The evidence ie the account was trustworthy because the preliminary evidence presented by the prosecution witnesses was not believed, the pieces of evidence did not prove helpful to the prosecution, against the accused beyond the shadow of doubt. Failed to prove his case, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused Or. , By extending the benefit of the doubt, he was acquitted of the charge
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
