Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus RIAZ AHMAD


Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), section 8, allowed the appeal to be considered on the ground that the matter was a service matter to the civil court under the provisions of the Service Tribunals Act 1974 and the courts. Should not have been entertained by the decisions of The following were without such jurisdiction

1986 S C M R 55

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

Mirza RIAZ AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1252 of 1983, decided on 28th October, 1985.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.8‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider question that matter being a service matter civil Court should not have entertained same in view of provisions of Service Tribunals Act, 1974 and that judgments of Courts below were thus without jurisdiction.

M.M. Saeed Baig, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Respondent No.l in person.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑

‑The facts are that the respondent (No.l) was a dispenser, in Bahawalpur. His services were placed at the disposal of the Town Committee Samma Satta. Subsequently he was told that his services were no longer required by the Town Committee, Samma Satta and he was directed to report to his parent Department i.e. the Health Department but the Health Department refused to accept him. The respondent, therefore, filed a suit to the effect that being an employee of the Health Department he was entitled to receive his pay and other allowances from that Department. The suit was decreed in his favour. The Province of Punjab through Director Health filed an appeal which was dismissed as time‑barred by the learned District Judge, Bahawalpur. Feeling aggrieved the petitioner filed a civil revision in the High Court which agreed with the District Judge that the appeal had been rightly dismissed as barred by time.

Hence the present petition for leave to appeal.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Government/petitioner submits that being a service matter it should not have been entertained by the learned Civil Court in view of the provisions of Service Tribunal Act, 1974, and that the judgments of the Courts below are, therefore, without jurisdiction.

3. Leave is granted to consider the above‑noted question of jurisdiction.

To be heard on the same record with permission to file additional documents.

M.B.A Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.