Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition No. 63‑K of 1986, decided on 25th August, 1986.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal at Karachi passed in Appeal No. 86(K) of 1983).
‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5‑‑Limitation‑‑Time barred appeal‑‑No application /request made for condonation of delay‑‑Order of Service Tribunal dismissing appeal as time‑barred, upheld‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Petitioner in person.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 25th August,‑ 1986.
The Service Appeal of the petitioner was dismissed on the ground that it was filed beyond the period of limitation and was time‑barred. The Tribunal also found that no application for request for condonation of delay was made.
2. The petitioner, who appeared in person, admitted that he had not applied for condonation of delay before the Tribunal. The order of the learned Tribunal in the circumstances, is unexceptionable. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
M . I . Petition dismissed
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer