Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition No. 286‑K of 1984, decided on 13th August,1986.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal at Karachi, dated 2‑5‑1984 passed in Appeal No. 105(K) of 1982).
‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Airport Security Force (Service) Rules, 1978, Rr.12(7) tt 12(2)‑‑Interpretation of Rules‑‑Ambiguity or back of clarity with regard to interpretation of rules‑‑Leave granted to examine reconciliation and interpretation of rules given by Service Tribunal.
Petitioner in Person.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 13th August, 1986.
This petition is from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal whereby, the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed.
2. The learned Tribunal has itself conceded in the impugned judgment that there was some ambiguity or lack of clarity with regard to the interpretation of rule 12(7) and rule 12(2) of the A.S.F. (Service) Rules, 1978. The learned Tribunal has attempted to reconcile the two rules and the interpretation so given needs examination. Leave to appeal is accordingly granted. The appeal will be heard on the same record.
M. I. Leave granted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer