Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUR REHMAN versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 406, 409, 471 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (I1 of 1947), Section 5 (2) a leave of appeal for an appeal in which the accused is actually charged 249 was acquitted. Hey, the criminal code of conduct, and later prosecuted as a witness, and then seven other people who were actually co-accused were presented by the prosecution in support of the case and they probably Supporting the prosecution to expose himself and the case is needed. Granted further consideration
1986 S C M R 1830

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

ABDUR REHMAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 416 of 1984, decided on 18th May, 1986.

(Against the judgment/Order, dated 30‑9‑1984 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 1981).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑--

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 406, 409, 471 109‑ Prevention of Corruption Act (I1 of 1947), S. 5(2)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Contention that person originally accused had been acquitted under S.249‑A, Criminal Procedure Code, and subsequently produced as prosecution witness and seven other persons who were also originally co‑‑accused in case were produced by prosecution in support of its case and they probably supported prosecution in order to get themselves exonerated‑‑Contention having force and matter requiring further consideration‑‑Leave granted.

Ch. Mahmudul Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 18th May, 1986.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑

Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court, dated 30‑9‑1984, dismissing his appeal in a case under sections 406, 409 and 471, P.P.C. read with section 109, P.P.C. and section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and was sentenced inter alia to 2 years' R.I.

2. The main contention raised by the petitioner's counsel is that although the Manager of the Forms Press, who prepared the report Exh . P. C. was an accused person in the first instance but he was acquitted under section 249‑A, Cr.P.C. and was subsequently produced as a prosecution witness. He added that as a matter of fact as many as 7 other persons, who were also originally co‑accused in the case, have been produced by the prosecution in support of its case and that they were probably persuaded to support the prosecution case in order to get themselves exonerated.

3. We feel that the contention has force and the matter needs further consideration. Leave is, therefore, granted for the said purpose.

M. Y. H. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Punch lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.