Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JAMIL AHMED HASHMI versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS,LAMABAD


Article 212 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), removing section 4 from the service judge of the service tribunal that the applicant has been found guilty of allegations against him which was denied in law or without factual leave Is gone

1986 S C M R 1671 (1)

Present: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ

S. JAMIL AHMED HASHMI‑‑Petitioner

versus

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition No. 283‑K of 1984, decided on 16th February, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal Karachi, dated 27‑2‑1984 passed in Appeal No. 17(K) of 1982).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4‑‑Removal from service‑‑Judgment of Service Tribunal that petitioner was proved to be guilty of charges framed against him unexceptionable in law or on facts‑‑Leave refused.

Petitioner in person.

Shahudul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 16th February, 1986.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑

This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 27‑2‑1984 dismissing petitioner's appeal and thereby upholding the order of his removal from service.

2. We have heard the petitioner who appears in person, and have gone through the record of the case. We find that no exception can be taken in law or on facts against the judgment of the Service Tribunal that the petitioner was proved to be guilty of the charges framed against him.

3. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Dinga lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.