Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ALI MUTLAQ versus ANWAR FATIMA


Article 1 (185) Sind Tenant Limitation Ordinance (XI of XII of 1979), Section 16 (2) 21 Controversy over questions of law which the rent controller has ordered whether he is a tenant under Sindh 1616 Exclude the landlord's request to defend? The rental cover ordinance was an interim order and as to whether any appeal against it has been filed under section 21 of the ordinance.
1986 S C M R 1674

Present: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat,

MUHAMMAD ALI MUTLAQ‑‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. ANWAR FATIMA and 5 others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 71‑K of 1986, decided on 23rd April, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of Sind High Court, Karachi, dated 1‑12‑1985 in F.R.A. No. 278 of 1985). ,

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), Ss.16(2) 21‑‑Conflict of decisions existing on question of law whether order of Rent Controller dismissing an application of landlord for striking off defence of tenant under 5.1612) of Sind Rented Premises Ordinance was an interim order and as such whether any appeal against it lay under S.21 of Ordinance‑‑An authoritative decision of Supreme Court required on said question which was likely to govern large number of cases‑‑Leave to appeal granted.

1986 C L C 43 ref.

Akhtar Mahmood, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Respondent No. 2 in person.

Date of hearing: 23rd April, 1986.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑

There seems to be conflict of .decisions on the question of law whether order of the Rent Controller dismissing an application of the landlord for striking out the defence of the defendant under section 16(2) of the Sind Rented Premises Ordinance is an interim order and as such any appeal against it lies under section 21 of the Ordinance. By the judgment, dated 1‑12‑1985 from which leave to appeal is sought in this petition learned Judge in the Sind High Court following earlier decision reported as 1986 C L C 43 held that the order of the nature above is not appeal able. It is, therefore, necessary that an authoritive decision of this Court on the aforesaid question of law be rendered as it is likely to govern large number of cases.

Leave is granted. Security Rs.1,000. Appeal arising out' of this petition will be heard on the present record but it is open to the parties to file additional documents, if any.

M. Y. H. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Hattar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.