Section 5 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 265K Illegal Settlement Complaint, Applicant's Return was a complainant in a similar complaint which was withdrawn and the trial court denied the applicant as complainant. Denied that neither the names of the witnesses nor any statement from the applicant summarizing the evidence were not on the record that the trial court, despite providing the necessary details, sought the persons to be presented as witnesses. Failed, the trial court reversed the findings regarding the exercise of the options available under section 265, CRPC Allowed to drive. In the judgment, the trial court's order to acquit the accused was to be recorded in every case, before the available material was discussed and the merit was dismissed by the trial court as a result of the invalidity of the trial, though it had skillfully The order was not written but they reached him. The correct decision was only mistaken because it had to record the verdict in favor of the accused. On rejecting the complaint, the High Court upheld the trial court's order because it was proper and proper and the merit was invalid. The complaint was dismissed because the accused was acquitted of the charge, while the High Court directed the provincial government to examine the affairs of the educational institution and to keep it on the right path to protect the children, It was reviewed according to the real victims
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
