Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Guarantee, Grants of both the accused and the offender of the same age group and this question was further investigated by the applicant. Bail allowed

1986 P Cr. L J 954

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

MUHAMMAD IQBAL and another Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No 1372 of 1983, decided on 29th November, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.377‑‑bail, grant of Both accused and victim of sodomy of same age‑group and question whether petitioner alone could commit sodomy forcibly with victim boy, an unwilling partner, requiring further inquiry‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circum stances.

Muhammad Bashir Khan for Petitioners.

Ashfaq Ahmad Khan for the State.

Date of hearing: 28th November, 1983.

ORDER

Muhammad lqbal and Allah Bakhsh, petitioners have applied for the grant of bail after the same was refused to them by Additional Sessions Judge, vide order, dated 18‑10‑1983.

2. Faiz Rakhah lodged a report at Police Station Mumtazabad on 12‑9‑1983 to the effect that his relative Muhammad Ayub aged 15 years on the preceding night at 9‑00 p.m. went to purchase certain articles from the shop of Muhammad Iqbal, petitioner. At that time Allah Bakhsh, petitioner, was present with Muhammad Iqbal. After purchasing sundry articles from that shop Muhammad Ayub was returning home when au of a sudden Muhammad Iqbal and Allah bakhsh, petitioners, emerged from the Jawar crop of Ahmad Bakhsh and encircled him. They dragged him inside the Jawar crop. Muhammad lqbal allegedly committed sodomy with him while Allah Bakhsh stood outside the field. The shreiks of Muhammad Ayub attracted Rahim Bakhsh and Khan Muhammad P.Ws. and on their arrival the petitioners decamped. During the investigation both the petitioners were arrested. The medical examination of Muhammad Ayub (the victim) revealed no marks of violence on his person and the doctor opined that he was habitual passive agent. His anal swabs were taken and sent to the Chemical Examiner for detection of semen, therefore, the opinion as to whether Muhammad Ayub was subjected to sodomy or not was postponed by the doctor.

3. On 15‑11‑1983 I allowed interim bail to Allah Bakhsh, petitioner, since it was not alleged against him that he had committed sodomy with Muhammad Ayub. The case was adjourned till today for production of the report of Chemical Examiner which has been received and is in positive.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record.

5. Muhammad lqbal, petitioner, is also stated to be a teen‑aged boy like the victim. There is no allegation that Allah Bakhsh, petitioner, had seized the victim. Muhammad Iqbal petitioner, had forcibly committed the act of sodomy with Muhammad Ayub. It requires further inquiry as if Muhammad lqbal, petitioner, all alone could commit sodomy forcibly with Muhammad Ayub who was an unwilling partner as both are stated to be of same age group. In the circumstances I am inclined to allow this petition. The interim bail granted to Allah Bakhsh, petitioner is confirmed and Muhammad Iqbal, petitioner, is directed to be released or, bail subject to his furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety in like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Multan.

S.G.D Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Daharki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.