Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. ROBINA BIBI versus S.H.O., DERA NAWAB SAHIB


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199, not to release any evidence on record suggesting that the Station House Officer is pressing the applicant to support the version given in the FIR petitioner in case of his abduction. , Which is in the case of his abduction and has been summoned only by the Station House Officer. Statement, no illegal interference was made by the respondents, in which the written request was denied

1986 P Cr. L J 715

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

Mst. ROBINA BIBI Petitioner

Versus

S.H.O., DERA NAWAB SAHIB and another‑‑Respondents

Writ Petition No.202 (Bwp.) of 1985, decided on 7th May, 1985.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑--

‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Writ, issuance of‑‑No evidence on record to suggest that Station House Officer pressurising petitioner to support version given in F. I. R.‑‑Petitioner, an essential witness, in case of her abduction and being summoned by Station House Officer only for recording her statement‑‑No illegality, held, committed by respondents, in circumstances‑‑Writ petition dismissed.

Malik Muhammad Aslam for Petitioner.

Date of hearing: 7th May, 1985.

JUDGMENT

Mst. Robina Bibi petitioner, through filing of this Constitutional petition, prays for a direction to be issued to the S.H.Os., Police Stations Dera Nawab and Mirpur respondents Nos. 1 and 2, that they should not harass and pressurise her to support the version given in F.I.R. No.65/85, dated 12‑4‑1985 under the provisions of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Mirpur, District Abbotabad.

2. Having heard learned counsel at some length I find that a case regarding abduction of the petitioner has been registered at Abbotabad. When asked the learned counsel states that the petitioner is not present in Court today. Be that as it may, the petitioner appears to be an essential witness in the case and if the respondents S.H.O., want her appearance before them for recording her statement it cannot be termed as illegal act on their part. There is no evidence that the petitioner has been pressurised by the respondents. In the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to issue any direction whatsoever prayed for in this case to the respondents. The petition is dismissed in limine.

S.G.D. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.