Section 302 (b) and 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section Q Q45 Qutel Amar, definition of common intention evidence was reported between the joint accused and the legal heirs, the appeal to the extent of the co-accused was compromised. Admitted on the basis and the sentence recorded by the trial court against the accomplices was set aside and acquitted, the FIR was filed without a six-hour explanation, a prosecution witness's opportunity He could not establish his presence. Syed's witness did not see the incident at the relevant time, and wrongly dismissed the deceased as being the real nephew. The evidence was denied. The eyewitness, who was an independent witness, was presented without any reason, and the idea could be reasonably drawn out that if the witness was examined in court, he would have been acquitted against litigation, in the dark of night. The incident occurred and no source of light was provided in the FIR or in the statement of the prosecution witness, in the darkness of the night the identity of the accused was not free from any suspicion, the circumstances did not prove a motive. But the mere indictment of the accused was not enough to prove that the rifle 7 mm allegedly recovered from the accused, given the opportunity Not sealed, and no forensic science laboratory was reported, saying the retrieval was uncovered was a fabricated story, which was obtained by the prosecution. , Since the late statement was not in a position to deliver. And this statement was confirmed by a member of the hospital staff
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
