Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LIAQUAT ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497/498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 bail has been in jail for the past nine months and the trial has not yet begun. There is no evidence against him stating that he was seen as the sole prosecutor's witness against the accused's bail.

1986 M L D 1835

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

LIAQUAT AL1 Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2128-B of 1986, decided on 13th August, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497/498--Offence of Zina (Enforcement -of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10--Bail--Accused in jail for last nine months and trial not yet started--No eye-witness existing against accused to state that he had seen him committing rape--Prosecutor solitary witness against accused--Bail granted.

Rana Shaukat Ali Khan for Petitioner

Abdullah Khalid for the State. .

ORDER

Mst. Nergis, prosecutrix in this case, lodged F.I.R. No.175, dated 10-11-1985, alleging that in the morning at about 4/5 a.m she went to the field for easing herself where the petitioner allegedly came and forcibly committed rape with her. She was coming out of the field after occurrence when her father Muhammad Ashraf, Ghulam Muhammad and Nisar Ahmad also arrived. The petitioner was arrested on 12-11-1985 and since then he is in jail. The medical examination of the prosecutrix revealed that she is old case of sexual intercourse and that the result of swabs of the prosecutrix has not yet been received, from the office of the Chemical Examiner. The challan is stated to have since been put in Court and no evidence has so far been recorded. The petitioner applied for the grant of bail but remained unsuccessful, hence this petition.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and also perused the record.

3. The petitioner is in jail for the last nine months and his trial has not so far commenced. There is no eye-witness against the petitioner who has seen committing rape. The prosecutrix is the solitary witness against him. In the circumstances I feel inclined to allow this petition. He be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in 'the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala.

M.Y.H Bail granted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.