Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHANOO versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 7 307/34 & 4 324 / of34 The nature of the crime in the abdomen made it easy that the injury was on the body part, so it would not make a case of assassination and The sentence was changed to. S. 324/34, under panel code

1986 P Cr. L J 1840

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

SHANOO and others Appellants

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Appeal No.492 of 1984, decided on 10th December, 1985.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

‑‑‑Ss. 307/34 & 324/34‑‑Nature of offence‑‑Injury in abdomen declared simple‑‑Mere fact that injury was caused on vital part of body, held, would not make case of murderous assault‑‑Conviction and sentence was, therefore, altered to one under S‑ 324/34, Penal Code.

Mian Muhammad Akram Ranjha for Appellants.

Mian Muhammad Bashir for the State.

Date of hearing: 10th December, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal arises from the judgment of learned Magistrate, Section 30, Chiniot, whereby he on 29‑9‑1984 convicted Shano and Falak Sher appellants under section 307/34, P.P.C. and sentenced them to five years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.5,000 in default thereof six months' R.I.

2. The learned counsel while conceding the allegations that Falak Sher had caught hold of the victim Muhammad P.W. 2 and Shano appellant had caused him injury in the abdomen, the learned counsel has challenged the nature of the offence. He maintained that since the injury caused by Shanoo appellant was found simple, therefore, the appellants could not have been convicted under section 307/34, P.P.C.

Consequently the learned counsel for the State has supported the judgment of the trial Court.

3. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I feel inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the appellants inasmuch as I find that the injury allegedly caused by Shanoo has been declared simple. The mere fact that the injury was inflicted on the vital part of the body would not make it a case of murderous assault punishable under section 307/34, P.P.C. That being the position the conviction of the appellants under section A 307/34, P.P.C., is set aside and instead they are convicted under section 324/34, P.P.C., and sentenced to two years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.5,000 in default thereof six months' R.I. each. The fine when recovered be paid to Muhammad P.W. 2 (injured witness) as compensation.

S.A. Conviction /sentence altered.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Laliah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.