FAUJI FOUNDATION THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER (ENGINEERING) versus CHANAN DIN AND SONS
Section 14, 20 and 30 award of a fresh contract by the applicant to a third party upon completion of work pending the completion of work by the respondent, reference to the dispute between the parties to the defendant.113 Is Rs. 78,207, by filing a claim by the defendant of the arbitration clause in the contract, from the sum of Rs. 1,24,18,619 through arbitration of Rs. Under the terms of the contract under Rule of Law, the defendant's claim was to be limited to the amount for which he issued notice to the applicant, neither the court nor the arbitral arbitration act. 1940 section was able to expand the scope of application of the agreement or agreements made under 20 and the defendant and the amount of difference between such third party. His contract was beyond the jurisdiction of the arbitrator, not to be influenced by his imagination and intent, but he was obliged to enforce the unanimous C agreement, leaving the errors of the agreement between the parties to the High Court unconstitutional. Present the trial to the trial court for its decision in terms of reference.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
