Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SALAMAT ALI versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Adultery

1986 P Cr. L J 221

[Karachi]

Before Ally Madad Shah, J

SALAMAT ALI and another Applicants

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 1032 of 1985, decided on 21st August, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 16‑‑Bail‑‑Delay in lodging F.I.R.‑‑Accused declaring themselves husband and wife before filing of F.I.R.‑‑Bail granted in circumstances.

1984 P Cr.LJ. 129 and 1985 P Cr.LJ. 927 rel.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Applicants.

Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

Both the applicants are facing trial for an offence punishable under section 16 of the offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. It is alleged that the applicant Salamat Ali had abducted Mst. Allah Rakhi alias Nasreen on 30‑5‑1985. The report of the incident was made on 21‑6‑1985. ,

The learned counsel for the applicants has alleged that false case has been set up against the applicants, who are legally wedded husband and wife. He has made reference to a certificate of Nikah showing that the applicants had contracted marriage in accordance with Christian rites on 17‑5‑1985 and they performed fresh Nikah after embracing Islam on 18‑6‑1985. He has also made reference to an order on a Habeas Corpus petition filed by the applicant Salamat An for the recovery of the applicant Nasreen. The learned Assistant Advocate General does not oppose the application in respect of Mst. Nasreen merely on the ground that she' is a lady but he has opposed the application in respect of applicant Salamat Ali.

There is delay in the lodging of F.I.R. Before the filing of the F.I.R., the applicants had declared that they were husband and wife. The learned counsel for the applicant has cited two authorities viz. 1984 P Cr. L J 129 and 1985 P Cr. L J 927, which support his contention for the grant of bail. Bail is granted to both the applicants in the sum of Rs.15,000 each with one surety and P.R. in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Nazir of thin Court.

M . A . K Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.