Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED SHAMSHAD RAZI versus THE STATE


Sections 498 and 499 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) amount to bail, the monthly salary of the accused's father is Rs 976 and the supporter of the seven members of his family to provide a guarantee of Rs 50,000. Not in the position of Rs. 25,000 under the circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 212

[Karachi]

Before Haider Ali Pirzada, J

Syed SHAMSHAD RAZI Applicant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 744 of 1985, decided on 1st July, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑Ss. 498 & 499‑‑Bail amount, reduction of‑‑Accused's father getting monthly salary of Rs.976 and supporter of 7 members of him family‑ Applicant not in a position to furnish surety of Rs.50,000‑‑Amount of surety reduced to Rs.25,000 in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Applicant.

Abdul Ghafoor Mangi Asstt.A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

This is an application under section 498, Cr.P.C. The applicant has filed this application for reduction of surety amount.

My learned brother Mr. Justice Z.C. Valiani enlarged the applicant on bail on 29‑2‑1984 and ordered to furnish surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount.

Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaq the learned counsel for the applicant has moved this application for reducing the surety on the ground of the crippled financial position of the applicant's father who is working as a put‑overman in T and T at a monthly salary of Rs.976. He is a supporter of 7 members of his family and as such he cannot arrange surety.

Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi the learned Assistant Advocate‑General has no objection for reduction of the surety amount.

I find that the applicant is not in a position to furnish surety as ordered by my learned brother. He has made out a sufficient cause for furnishing of surety in the sum of Rs.25,000 and the ground advanced appears to me to be reasonable.

I am, therefore, of the opinion that lie is not in a position to furnish surety and in the circumstances, I allow the applicant to furnish surety in the sum of Rs.25,000 with one P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

M.A.K. Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Islamabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.