STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MST. BEGUM RASHEEDA JAMIL
Sections 122 and 124 of the group insured the deceased widow's insurance benefits on the grounds that Late had violated the contract during the employment of the applicant, whose husband died in the service of the appellant, the insurance benefits. The applicant's claim was denied by the appellant on the basis that the applicant's husband was also on the pay of the Education Department while in the service of the appellant, who was in charge of his service contract. Was against the terms and conditions. Appellant contended that concealment meant that the applicant was not entitled to receive benefits in such concealment, his contract was terminated in 1997. Appellant joined Appellant during the services of the deceased. The employee, up to the date of his death, and the defendant had obtained client and financial benefits for the appellant, and during that time, the appellant was never harmed by the defendant's alleged breach of contract, And only when making this claim in the year 2007, did the appellant find out that the declaration made by the deceased was false. ? During that life, and no termination of the contract or termination was ordered until the contract was prohibited from direct or indirect employment related to the life insurance business of any other insurer, And those words meant \ any other employer \ to include someone. Another employer transacted the same business, and the expression - no other employer nature so the Jewish army was applicant / widow's claim was valid Appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
