Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411 Convention of Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 22 robbery, burglary of dishonest property, grant of further inquiry, test identification parade in FIR entry The complainant's effect was not named in the complainant's implication in the delay in holding the CIR and was involved in the case through the complainant's supplementary statement recorded four months and eighteen days after the incident, and he too No test identification parade was held without identifying a source (15) The day was not specified in the FIR entry, in which the first floor The fact that the FIR was recorded after deliberation and consultation, the accused could not be denied bail only because he had some cash, was charged, Investigation of convicted case was completed The case was one of further investigations The accused was granted bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
