Offer, Third Schedule, Sections 1, 6, 7, 23 and 34 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Transferred from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the Scope of Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Applications dismissed. Various crimes, such as the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, aimed at preventing and abetting sectarian violence, for the purpose of firing, throwing acid, and killing by injury in the mosque, moving their cases to regular courts. The immediate trial of the crime was. Deciding whether a crime was worth hearing under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the courts had to see whether this process had a tendency to create a feeling of fear and insecurity in the minds of the people or any section of society. This action was not necessarily taken. In the eyes of the general public, a law-related schedule was just as important as the law itself, which can be used to create provisions under the Schedule of the Third Schedule to the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Should be given due importance, and the first three paragraphs were inherently normal, while the fourth paragraph specifically described crime so as to cover a crime. Such a crime nexus with Article 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and the Anti-Terrorism Court, clearly in an imperative paragraph 4 of the Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 The offenses were mentioned which would prove to be a crime. Were within the scope / jurisdiction of paragraph 4 of the Third Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and the Counter Terrorist
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
