Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL


Section 185 ((Act) of the Limitation Act (IX of 8 190 Section)), the limitation limitation suit challenging the gift that the deceased had given in favor of his grandson, was excluded, interfering with the time-limitation decision in the second appeal. Ineligible decision was dismissed, application dismissed
1985 S C M R 1221

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

SARDAR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

MUHAMMAD AFZAL and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 382 of 1977, decided on 16th February, 1985.

(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 8‑4‑1977, passed in R.S.A. No. 402 of 1975).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 3‑‑Limitation‑‑Suit challenging gift made by deceased in favour of his grandsons, dismissed as time‑barred‑‑Order upheld in second appeal‑‑Decision not being amenable to interference, petition dismissed.

Bashir Ahmad Alvi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners.

S.M. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court with M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 16th February, 1985.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑

The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, dated 8‑4‑1977, dismissing his R.S.A.

2. The facts, briefly, are that one Ghulam Ghaus (now deceased) had 7 sons. Out of his sons, Nazir died, Ghulam Ghaus made a gift of 1/7th share of his land in favour of 3 sons of Nazir (i.e. Muhammad Afzal, Muhammad Akram and Muhammad Ashraf), in August, 1960. Ghaus himself died on 11‑1‑1966 whereupon his remaining six sons as well as his above named 3 grandsons (respondents herein) inherited the remaining land as his heirs. The petitioners thereupon challenged the gift made by Ghulam Ghaus in favour of his grandsons (respondents 1 to 3 herein). The suit was dismissed by the learned trial Court as time‑barred. The petitioners then filed an appeal before the District Judge which, too, was dismissed on the same ground on 6‑6‑1975. Thereafter, the petitioners filed an R.S.A. before the High Court which, apart from other reasons, was also dismissed on the ground that the suit was barred by time.

Hence the present petition.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. He has not been able to show that the suit was not time‑barred.

The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having no merit.

M.I. Petition dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.