Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus ZIA-UL-HASSAN


Article 185 (3) of the Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894), Sections 26 and 54 of the Civil Code (V 1908), 0 XLI, r 1 permit to examine whether the acquisition of land In view of Sections 26 and 54 of the Act of 1894. A. Read with XLI, r 1, CPC, Appeals filed within time were not officially filed if the appeals were competent, complete and timely, even if required by law. The Court's Act to Return Appeal Notes may be interrupted or curtail the applicant's already used correctly
1985 S C M R 1217

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

THE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑‑Petitioner

versus

ZIA‑ul‑HASSAN and 4. others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petitions Nos. 989 to 993 of 1979, decided on 24th February, 1985.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 6‑10‑1979 in R.F.As. Nos. 50 to 54 of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894), Ss. 26 & 54 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), 0. XLI, r. 1‑‑Leave granted to examine whether in view of Ss. 26 & 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with O. XLI, r. 1, C.P.C., appeals as filed within time were not competently filed‑‑If appeals were competent, complete and within time, whether act of office of Court of returning memos. of appeals for doing something not required by law could impede or curtail right of petitioner already properly exercised.

M.M. Saeed Baig, Advocate Supreme Court with Ijaz Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 24th February, 1985.

ORDER

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑

Leave to appeal is granted to examine whether in view of sections 26 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act read with Order XLI, rule 1, C.P.C. the appeals as filed within time on 11‑2‑1978 were not competently filed. If the appeals were competent, complete and within time whether the act of the office of the Court of returning the memos of the appeals for doing something not required by the law could impede or curtail the right of the petitioner already properly exercised.

The interim order to continue. Let the appeal be heard on the present record with liberty to the parties to file such additional documents as they may consider necessary. Let the appeal be completed for early hearing.

M. I. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Kharan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.