Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), AXLI, R31 was intended to prove that the defendant, as a beneficiary of the variation of the burden of gift components / accessories, had the property legally Was transferred, three components, offer, acceptance and takeover. Were the litmus tests to determine the authenticity of a Tamil or gift transaction? No proof of delivery of possession was found to be sufficient to substantiate the facts of the gift unless its original transaction was proved and no other alternative was confirmed in the case. The suit land was located and the Revenue Officer approving the exchange was not presented as a witness to prove the fact of the transaction. The appellate court had excluded all available evidence of the case after which it agreed with the trial court that there was no irregular or unlawful action by the courts below the validity. Was deleted
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
