Sections 8, 42 and 54 law evidence (10 of 1984), arts 17 and 79 suit for recovery of possession of immovable property, declarations and fact finding by two courts under permanent injunction against the parties to the death of the suit property The owner had legal heirs, but the plaintiff accepted the defendant's Tamil conversion in favor of the defendant. Saying that he was the slightest witness to the conversion and rightly impressed the same defense witness that the other minor witness of the mutation also correctly affected the thumb and at this time confirmed the change in question, even the owner Were present and signed the same plaintiff in which they failed to establish their claim by presenting regular, convincing and conclusive evidence, and likewise the Appellate Court of Appeal approved appropriate rationales and decisions. Examining the evidence on file and not having any illicit interference or defamation was not warranted. In this amended jurisdiction, the accuracy of the High Court's interference guarantee or jurisdiction error was excluded in the revised situation.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
