Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497/498 Court of Appeal (XLV of 1860), Section 307/148/149 The alleged wounds allegedly targeted the plaintiff's complainant party according to which The attack has been launched and a cross case has been registered against them. After providing evidence of bail, the aggression of the parties was yet to be initiated by the trial court

1985 M L D 743

[Lahore]

Before Abdul Waheed, J

Malik MUHAMMAD TUFAIL another--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3161-B of 1983, decided on 2nd January, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497/498--Penal Court (XLV of 1860), S. 307/148/149--Injuries allegedly inflicted by accused declared simple--Complainant party stated to have initiated attack and a cross-case registered against them- Question is to which party was aggressor yet to be decided by trial Court after recording evidence- -Bail granted.

Rana Ijaz Ahmad Khan for Petitioners.

C . M . Latif for the State

Qurban Ali for the Complainant.

ORDER

This order shall dispose of two applications; one for pre-arrest bail filed by Muhammad Akram petitioner and the other for post-arrest bail filed on behalf of Malik Muhammad Tufail petitioner in a case under sections 148 and 307/149, P,P.C. registered at Police station Manawan, District Lahore, on 21st of October, 1983.

2. It is alleged that on a dispute over elections the petitioners and their co-accused armed with fire-arms, hatchet and Dangs formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object thereof launched an attack causing three injuries to three persons including one fire-arm. All the injuries were declared as simple. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that in fact ,the complainant party initiated the attack and a case was registered against them also under section A 307, P.P.C.

3. The learned counsel for the State admits that the accused in the cross case, challaned under section 336, P.P.C. are on bail.

4. The question as to which of the parties was the aggressor would be decided by the trial Court after recording evidence. In the circumstances of the case, both the applications are accepted, the interim pre-arrest bail already allowed to Muhammad Akram petitioner is confirmed B and Malik Muhammad Tufail petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner Cantt; Lahore.

5. Muhammad Akram petitioner shall join the investigation.

M. Y. H.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Mangal Sada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.