Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 498 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 399 Electricity Act (IX of 1910), Section 39A The full challan of the investigation is complete for submission to the court, already paying the bills After being placed in the relevant premises, there is no possibility that the arrest warrant was made a pre-arrest case before it was used more illegally.

1985 M L D 750(1)

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Muhammad Dogur, J

MAZHAR HUSSAIN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3304/ B of 1984, decided on 4th December, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.379--Electricity Act (IX of 1910) , S. 39-A.- -Investigation complete--Challan complete for submission to Court--Arrears of bill having already been paid--Accused having left concerned premises, arid there being no chance of his further illegally using electricity--Case of pre-arrest bail, held, was made out.

Syed Zahid Hubsain Bokhari for Petitioner.

Sh. Muhammad Nawaz for the State.

ORDER

The facts of t-he case enumerated in my order, dated 26-11-1984 shall be read as part arid parcel of this order.

The A.S.I. who is present with record, has stated that the investigation is complete and the challan is also complete for submission to Court. He has further stated that the arrears of the bill on account of which the electricity connection was disconnected, have peen fund to be paid. It, has also testified the statement of the petitioner that he has left the premises, as such there is no chance of his further illegally using the electricity.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, I feel that a case for grant of pre-arrest bail has been made out. The interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner vide orders, dated 26-11-1984 is hereby confirmed. He shall, however furnish fresh bail bond in. the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Magistrate, WAPDA, Lahore.

S. A.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Mangowal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.