Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM SAKINA versus KHALID MASOOD AKHTAR NIAZI


West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 25 Family Suit Transfer Application for Suit to dissolve marriage by wife Transfer of case of transfer by wife to the restoration of pending marital rights in court under TT husband Application for Stabilizing Wife and Husband Default Settlement on Stabilizing Wife and Husband Default Settlement on Restoration of Marital Rights Pending in Family Court In the petition about L, the issue of marriage dissolution after the approval of the husband's order In the event of incomprehensibility, the transfer request was not pressurized by the applicant and was dealt with as it has been withdrawn under the circumstances.

1985 M L D 306

[Lahore]

Before C. A. Rahman, J

Mst. GHULAM SAKINA--Petitioner

Versus

KHALID MASOOD AKHTAR NIAZI--Respondent

Transfer Application No. 254/C of 1984, decided on 20th April, 1985.

West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--

---S. 25-A--Transfer of family suit--Application for--Suit for dissolution of marriage by wife pending in Court at T--husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in Court at L--Transfer application by wife for transfer of case of husband and consolidating same with suit for dissolution filed by wife pending in Court at T--Wife's suit for dissolution decreed during pendency of such app4catiori--Question of consolidation of decreed suit of wife and husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in Family Court at L, held, would not arise in view of husband's suit becoming infructuous after passing of decree in suit for dissolution of marriage--Transfer application was not pressed by applicant and thus disposed of as having been withdrawn in circumstances.

M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the suit for dissolution of marriage filed by the petitioner had been decreed by the Family Court, Talagang on 12-7-1984. The question of consolidation of the aforementioned suit and respondent's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in the Family Court, Lahore, would not arise under the circumstances. As a matter of fact the respondent's suit has become infructuous after the passing of the decree in the petitioner's suit for dissolution of marriage. The petitioner does not want to pursue this petition.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the transfer application stands disposed of having been withdrawn.

A.A.

Application withdrawn.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Samundri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.