Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUR RASHEED versus UNITED BANK LTD


The Code of Conduct 1908 opposed the request for transfer of a civil case to be transferred from the court where the case was sought; the trial court had no jurisdiction to try the same objection. Directed to resolve the matter. Regarding the jurisdiction fast and the applicant can refer to the High Court again if the case related to the trial is unsuccessful [jurisdiction]
1985 M L D 305

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Afzal Lone, J

ABDUR RASH EED--Petitioner

Versus

UNITED BANK Ltd. --Respondent

Transfer Application No. 4571C of 1984, decided on 29th January, 1985.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----

---S. 24--Transfer of civil case--Transfer application opposed on plea that Court from where suit was sought, to be transferred had no jurisdiction to try same--Objection to jurisdiction of Court also raised in written statement--Trial Court directed to dispose of issue regarding jurisdiction expeditiously and applicant could approach High Court again in case objection of jurisdiction failed before trial Court --[Jurisdiction]

S.M. Tayyab for Petitioner.

Mian Ehsanul Haq Bakhtiar for Respondent.

ORDER

This transfer application is opposed on the plea that the Court before whore the declaratory suit is pending has no jurisdiction to entertain it as only the special Court constituted under Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979 has jurisdiction in the matter. The submission is that section 24, C.P.C. would be attracted, only if the suit sought to be transferred, is found to be pending before a competent Court.

2. It has also been pointed out to the Bench that an objection to the jurisdiction of the civil Court, has already been raised by the respondent in his written statement. As the question of jurisdiction is subjudice before the learned Court below any decision on this issue by this Court, would amount to pre-empting the jurisdiction of the lower Court. The learned trial Court is, therefore, directed to dispose of the issue regarding jurisdiction expeditiously. The applicant can approach this Court again in case the respondent's objection fails before the trial Court. This transfer application is disposed of accordingly.

M. A. K.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.