The limitation of possession of the suit by the release of Articles 60 and 61 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 148 and 114, Articles 20 and 28, was that they were the owners in the suit land to the extent of their shares. Was done. Simultaneous accuracy of the land was in the possession of various owners and mortgages. The limitation period in respect of the return of the suit property will be counted from the first act of mortgage. And they can't be. The same defendants were accepted as owners when they could never succeed in the prediction or sale decree before the due date, ie a decree passed after 31 08 1991 in favor of any person in 31 8 1991. Could not be claimed by anyone who claimed to have acquired the right to own or through the prescription. According to the law, when the mortgagee was on the property of the mortgagee and received the loan, it should also be considered as payment. The term of the mortgage should be considered as the last transfer of the mortgage, not the obligation of the mortgagee in respect of the mortgaged property from the first creation of the mortgage. Could not claim more than that in the possession, the imposed judgment of both the courts was set aside and the judgment of the defendants was heard. Or was
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
