Find a Lawyer

MANAGING DIRECTOR SNGPL versus NEELAB CNG FILLING STATION

O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Temporary Joints, the three essential components of the grant of temporary injunction to the principle of immunity must exist in favor of the applicants, namely, the first case, the balance of convenience and irreparable loss prove the applicant's existence. The claim in this case has been claimed and the infringement court will need to see if the applicant will suffer more than withholding the injunction which the respondents will not accept from any court. The party has to bear the weight of adultery. The order will be granted only if there is a balance in favor of the applicant. The applicant is obliged to prove that in the event of refusal of order, he will suffer irreparable harm or injury.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Haji LAL MUHAMMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior Division, Islamabad 2014 PLD 199
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. Mst. AASMA NOSHEEN 2014 CLC 203
• BADSHAH GUL WAZIR v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLD 210
• MUHAMMAD ZAHIR v. AMIR SALEH 2014 MLD 212
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN 2014 PLD 222
• Syed RASHID ALI SHAH v. Mst. HALEEMA BIBI 2014 PLD 226
• SHAH BEHRAM v. State 2014 PCrLJ 226
• BAKHT MUNIR v. SECRETARY HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF N.W.-F.P., PESHAWAR 2014 PLC(CS) 226

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Depal Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes