MST. SHAHISTA BIBI versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, MACH
Sections 35 and 397 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3 and 6 are convicted of multiple offenses in the same trial Death sentence imposed by the Government The appellant was sentenced to death for executing the sentences arbitrarily and his total age was 214 years, after which the death sentence of the appellant was changed by the government to life imprisonment. Accordingly, the total period was sentenced to 214 years imprisonment and the total fine was Rs 17,200,000 or earlier imprisonment for a further term of 11/2 years. Appellant was sentenced to 42 years, 7 months and 21 days by the federal and provincial governments and jail authorities. Sections 35 and 397, refusing to plead with the appellant to deny the benefit of the CR PC, is equivalent to cruelty and he will certainly die from long prison sentences when multiple If the appellant is repeatedly sentenced to death, he will resolve it. The benefit granted to them by the general amnesty provided by the government cannot be benefited and ultimately its objection will be defeated precisely because the appellant could face natural death while imprisoned and the appellant's The scope of justice can be clearly met by providing beneficial provisions. It was directed that all the sentences given to the appellant be served and that it be considered running concurrently. That the appellant would also benefit from Section 382B, CR P 0, and that all waivers, whether granted by federal and provincial governments or prison authorities, would be allowed to appeal.
