Sections 324/427 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) appeal against a felony attempt to avenge the murder and the evasion of evidence leading to corruption, both the recovery of the crime, the recovery of the accused's influence. The accused played the role of the accused. The trial court acquitted both the accused in the firing without any fatal shooting. In the absence of recovery of the weapon, no benefit from the prosecution. Did not happen and was compared to the crime by the Franzic Science Laboratory. Recovery crime vacancies only reveal that the complainant has retained firearms and the attacker has left vacancies with no hidden name of the assailant. Was done and could not be used as a scandalous article or evidence against the accused persons was the final proof of the accused's guilt and it was only a suspicious case that the Institute alleges that it was suspected. The offender was found guilty and could not replace the evidence for the value of the fugitive on the facts of each case. Depending on whether the accused's conviction was consistent with the crime or guilt that was supposed to have been decided based on all the facts of the fugitive case, it could be used as a controversial piece of evidence which could not be read separately but The complainant failed to identify in any way the weakness of the decision or the failure to read any misrepresentation or evidence that could warrant the intervention of the High Court in the jurisdiction of the appeal.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
