Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

JAMADAR JALAL DIN versus MUHAMMAD YOUSUF


Article 185 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115, allowed the High Court to intervene in decisions and orders passed by the courts, with no place for interference.

1984 S C M R 1531 (1)

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

Jamadar JALAL DIN and another‑‑Petitioners

Versus

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition No. 717 of 1977, decided on 27th May, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 2‑10‑1977 of the Lahore High Court in R . S . A . No. 933 of 1965) .

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.115‑‑High Court found justified in interfering with judgments and decrees passed by Courts below‑‑No ground for interference made out‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Hasan Ahmad Kanwar, Advocate Supreme Court and Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Sh. Abdul Manan, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.

Date of hearing: 27th May, 1984.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH,

J.‑‑ This petition is directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, whereby he accepted the second appeal filed by the respondents herein and set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court, which was affirmed, on appeal, by the learned District Judge, Mianwali. In reversing the judgments passed by the two Courts below, the learned Judge in the High Court relied upon this Court's judgment in the case of Mst. Rehmat Bibi v. Nathe Khan and others P L D 1968 S C 197 .

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners at some length we find that the learned Judge in the High Court was justified in interfering with the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below and that this Court's judgment in the case of Mst. Rehmat Bibi was rightly relied upon. No ground for interference, therefore, is made out. This petition, accordingly, must fail and is dismissed hereby.

S.Q. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.