Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM


Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (Constitution of 1913), fails to submit the fifth probable value of section 22 (4) property.
1984 S C M R 1530

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

NOOR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner

Versus

MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petitions Nos. 580 and 581 of 1977, decided on 29th May, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 2‑7‑1977 of the Lahore High Court in R.S.A. No.157/77 and R.S.A.No.162/77).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Punjab Pre‑emption Act (I of 1913), S.22(4)‑‑Failure to deposit one‑fifth probable value of property‑‑Concurrent findings of fact recorded by Courts below‑‑No error shown in such findings‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Munir Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate on‑Record for Petitioners (in both the cases).

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 29th May, 1984.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑

This order will govern Civil Petition No.580 of 1977 and Civil Petition No.581 of 1977, as common questions of law and facts are involved in both the matters and the same have been disposed of by a common judgment.

The plaint of the petitioner, in both the matters, was rejected under section 22(4) of the Punjab Pre‑emption Act, 1913 for his failure to deposit in time, the one‑fifth probable value. The appeal against the said order filed before the District Judge failed and the second appeal was dismissed by the High Court in limine. Hence this petition for leave to appeal.

Sh. Munir Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the matters attempted to assail the concurrent findings recorded against the petitioner by the aforementioned three Courts, but was unable for show any error therein. These petitions, therefore, fail and are dismissed hereby.

S.Q. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Sukkur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.