Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
1984 P L C 1422 (1)
Appeal No. R. Y. Khan 5 of 1980, decided on 21st April, 1982.
‑‑ Adjournment‑Held, not a right to be claimed by a party or counsel.
‑‑‑ S. 38‑Review by Appellate Tribunal‑Provision of review, held, available in Ordinance.
Manhajal Beg for Appellant.
Respondent in person.
Date of hearing : 19th April, 1982.
This is a review petition against the decision passed by my learned predecessor, dated 15th October, 1980 whereby the appeal brought by the petitioner was dismissed. The said appeal was brought under section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The grounds for review are that the original counsel for the petitioner had gone out of Lahore and his junior made request for adjournment which was rejected. Adjournment is not a right Which may be claimed by any party or counsel for the party. The other thing is that there is no provision of .review in the Industrial Relations Ordinance. Therefore, if the order deciding the appeal is interfered with the order will be without jurisdiction. I, therefore, file the review petition.
M. Y. M.
Review petition failed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer