Find a Lawyer

WAZIR MUHAMMAD versus HAROON-UR-RASHID

In terms of section 24 (1) (2), 27 and 28 of the Sabbat, the trial court's requirement of non-availability of gold and sumab was not clear that the amount required for submission was not specifically mentioned. And the plaintiff in his own view that the claim that he claimed to be a real and genuine sale of the Zar-e-Imim collection of unknowns should be accepted as original sale consideration and market value. The decision should be made at the time of the final decision of this case, when under section 24 of the KP Pre-Impression Act 1987, one-third of the sale price has to be submitted. Price that shows the change in process / sale for submission within the court / designated period

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Mst. MUHMADIA v. State 2014 YLR 663
• MUHAMMAD ABID KHAN v. Mst. NOREEN 2014 MLD 670
• FAKHAR ZAMAN v. State 2014 MLD 690
• SHAKEEL KHAN v. State 2014 MLD 705
• UBAID AHMAD v. State 2014 YLR 707
• SULTANAT KHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 715
• MUHAMMAD SAAD ALI v. Mst. MARYAM KHAN 2014 CLC 715
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLC(CS) 726

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

top advocate from Khangarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes