Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Reduce the formation of dismissal notice for misconduct and read to the Managing Director on the telephone and approve the dismissal of the accused Labor Court, in which case, he will be referred to the Managing Director for proceedings of the inquiry and the record. Reinstatement was directed at. The result is that a new inquiry order should have been issued instead of a fresh order.

1984 P L C 947

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present : Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

MASHOOQ ALI

versus

PIONEER STEEL MILLS LTD.

Appeal No. QSA‑324 of 1983, decided on 6th July, 1.983:

Industrial dispute‑‑

Dismissal for misconduct‑Disciplinary action against accused reduced to form of a note and read over to Managing Director on telephone and he approving dismissal of accused‑Labour Court, in circumstances, held, rightly awarded re‑instatement directing Managing Director to himself go through enquiry proceedings and record his own findings‑Contention that instead of passing fresh order a fresh enquiry should have been ordered‑Rejected= Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25‑A & 38(3).

Ch. Muhammad 1kram for Appellant.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 3rd July, 1983.

JUDGMENT

In this appeal the decision, dated 29th May, 1983 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 3, Lahore at Ferozewala has been challenged, whereby the appellant was re‑instated in service and the Managing Director was directed to pass fresh orders within two months. It was further directed that if fresh order was not passed within two months, the appellant would stand re‑instated with back benefits.

2. The defects pointed out by the learned lower Court were that disciplinary action was reduced to the form of a note which was read over to the Managing Director on telephone when the Managing Director was at Islamabad and he approved the dismissal. Direction has been given by the learned lower Court to the Managing Director to himself go through the enquiry proceedings and to record his own findings.

3. Learned counsel for the 'appellant has argued that instead of giving direction for passing fresh order, fresh enquiry should have been ordered. I do not find any force in this argument. Since the learned lower Court found that the Managing Director had not applied his mind IA and had not himself perused the proceedings, therefore, he directed that fresh order be passed after going through the proceedings. The impugned order is just and proper and no interference is called for.

4. The appeal has no force and thus is dismissed in limine.

A. E. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Bat Khela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.