Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD versus INAYAT ALI


The dismissal of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&37 service against the driver's license of the Road Transport Board was suspended by the Traffic Authorities Services when the benefits granted by the Labor Court at the end of the suspension period. The job restoration was terminated with. Things are maintained by the Appellate Tribune

1984 P L C 791 (1)

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD

versus

INAYAT ALI

Appeal No. LHR‑480 of 1981, decided on 31st January, 1983.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑

‑‑ Ss. 25‑A & 37‑Termination of service‑Grievance petition against‑Driving licence of driver of Road Transport Board suspended by Traffic Authorities‑Services terminated for that reason on date when suspension period expired‑Reinstatement in service with back benefits awarded by Labour Court, in circum stances, upheld by Appellate Tribuna

Rai Zahid Hussain for Appellant.

Asmat Kamal for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 24th January, 1983.

JUDGMENT

The facts giving rise to this appeal are that the licence of the respondent was suspended by the Superintendent Police on 12th February, 1977 for three years and since without a driving licence the respondent could not legally drive any vehicle, his services were terminated by the appellant on 18th February, 1980. The learned lower Court, vide impugned decision dated 30th July, 1981 directed the reinstatement of the respondent in service with back benefits and the said order has been challenged in this appeal.

2. Since the period of suspension of the driving licence of the respondent had come to an end on 11th February. 1980, the respondent could not be terminated on 18th February, 1980. On 12th February, 1980 the licence of the respondent stood restored and thus the respondent could legally drive the vehicles from the said date. The learned lower Court has rightly directed his reinstatement in service with back benefits.

3. As a result of the observations made above, I do not find any force in the appeal and dismiss it.

A. E. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Quetta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.