Find a Lawyer

ALLAH WASAYA versus ABDUR RASHEED

The trial court granted dismissal by the trial court for dismissal of the suit filed by the applicant and the performance of section 13 of the student-proof suit for dismissing the case filed by the applicant for failure to prove the performance of the students. The name was retained. It was that the two courts below did not make the applicant illegal because they performed the dialogue in accordance with the provisions of the KP Pre-emption Act 1987. Mentioned the location where he had failed to present to the court about the performance of his competent Petitioner / Professional Importer compilation Makatibat, before it was successful in enforcing the discrimination rights, it was a pre-emptor / Applicant was bound to fail to perform applicant / pre-emptor tabs for all required students to perform strictly in accordance with the law WOW properly denied applicant / pre-emptor review request

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Mst. MAHAR ANGIZA v. Mst. BAKHTI RAJA 2014 MLD 962
• MUHAMMADULLAH v. State 2014 YLR 964
• SAADIA SAJJAD v. KMU 2014 MLD 971
• ZABIULLAH v. AWAL KHAN 2014 CLC 976
• LIAQAT ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Home and Tribal Affairs Department, Peshawar 2014 PLC(CS) 982
• MUMTAZ KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 CLC 985
• ARSHAD HABIB v. Mst. GHAZALA AKBAR 2014 MLD 988
• AMEER KHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 989

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Kandhkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes