JAVED KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD
Section 18 (g) and 24 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Articles 1969, 170, 173 and 344 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A and 1991 Constitutional Appeal Guarantee, Delay in Reference to Demand, Judicial Remand The Fair Trial Accused sought bail on the request for a delay in granting the validity of the reference under Section 1 6969 & under 170, CRPC was not specifically excluded nor any of the National Accountability Ordinances Contrary to the clause, NAB officials were obliged to implement it. Sections 169 and 170, to provide an opportunity for the accused to review the matters covered under the CRPC as well as to present himself properly in the matter and to file a reference against the accused in this regard. The delay was not appropriate. In this regard, without proper explanation, the accused could not be justified or justified in remanding the jail lockers behind the jail bars after every 15 days, which was a consulate, Section 170 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. , Under the provisions of CRPC or Section 18 (g), Article 10A of the Constitution has registered the writ of dento / accused, the inability of the appropriate material to be filed against the accused Was used for the purpose of prosecuting an accused under section 173, CCP or any reference under Section 24 (b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 Bail was allowed in the case of the commission of any offense against the accused person.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
