Find a Lawyer

MST. BIBI KHWAZADA versus HABIB UR REHMAN

Applicants applying for a Section 12 (2) Special Relief Act (of 1877), applying for a Section 42 suit declaration, believed that they owned the suit property to the extent of their shares but did not submit it. had gone. Because it was claimed by the claimants that the unidentified persons had simultaneously dismissed the request for separation of the injunction, in order to obtain an injunction that had no effect on their rights. Veterans also knew of the case against their father and brothers. The present petition was filed on behalf of the brothers of the applicants who were jointly residing in one house. Was. The two courts below had properly appreciated the evidence and revenue records on record to establish fraud by the respondents in any kind of unlawful interference or unlawful interrogation of the facts recorded by the following courts. The regulation or the reading of any misrepresentation or evidence was reviewed by the applicants

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. Mst. SURAYA BEGUM 2014 MLD 1080
• WAJID ALI v. State 2014 YLR 1081
• IJAZ AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health, Peshawar 2014 CLC 1084
• AZIZ AHMAD v. EJAZ AHMAD 2014 MLD 1095
• JAVED KHAN v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD 2014 PCrLJ 1100
• SDA v. HEC 2014 MLD 1110
• Mst. SHEREEN SHAHZADGAI v. SAIFUR REHMAN 2014 MLD 1116
• MUBARAK ALI SHAH v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 2014 CLC 1117

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

top civil advocates from Khangarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes