Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD INAVAT versus STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code section 409 was also charged with criminal misconduct of trust, reduction of sentence and misappropriation of only 194 rupees after sentencing the accused in jail for more than 1 month after losing his job. Imposed, one year RI changed to Rs 500 fine [punishment]

1984 P Cr. L J 3095

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD INAYAT-Appellant

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 444 of 1979, heard on 11th July, 1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-

-- S. 409-Criminal breach of trust-Sentence, reduction in Besides losing service accused remaining in jail for more than 1 months after conviction-Accused also liable for misappropriation of Rs. 194 only-Sentence of one year's R. I. altered to fine of Rs. 500 in circumstances.-[Sentence].

Shahid Hussain Kadri for Appellant.

Shabbir Lali for the State.

Date of hearing : 11th July, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Rawalpindi, whereby he on 16th April, 1979 convicted Muhammad Inayat appellant under section 409, P. P. C. and sentenced him to one year's R. I. and a fine of Rs. 200 in default thereof to further R. I. for two months.

2. The learned counsel has not challenged the conviction of the appellant and rightly so because there is sufficient evidence to connect the appellant with the commission of offence punishable under section 409, P. P. C. He simply requested for leniency in the matter of sentence. In the circumstance of the case that the appellant has not only lost his service but also remained in jail for more than 11 months after his conviction and that he misappropriated Rs. 194 only, I feel inclined to alter the nature of sentence from one year's R. I. to a fine of Rs. 500 in default thereof to further R. I. for 6 months. The fine of Rs. 200 already awarded by the trial Court is, however, maintained. Resul tantly, the appellant shall deposit Rs. 700 with the trial Court within two months, failing which, the trial Court shall issue warrants for his arrest and detention.

S. G. D. Order accordingly,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Lower Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.