Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMANULLAH KHAN SINDHOO versus SHABIR HUSSAIN, S. H. O. POLICE STATION SUTRAH, DISTRICT SIALKOT


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Habitat Corps Section HO confessed that a dinato has been declared a suspect in a registered case but after some interrogation, he was not allowed to release Ditto. Because he needs to file his liberty petition, in the circumstances

1984 P Cr. L J 3096 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Akhtar Hassan, J

AMANUL, KHAN SIN DHOO-Petitioner

Versus

SHABIR. HUSSAIN, S. H. O. POLICE STATION SUTRAH, DISTRICT SIALKOT AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 375-H of 1983, decided on 24th August, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

-- S. 491 - Habeas corpus - S. H. O. admitting to have called detenu being suspect in a registered case but after some interrogation letting him off -Detenu also not pressing for any further action since he required his freedom-Petition filed, in circumstances.

Muhammad Akbar Cheema for Petitioner.

Ch. Riasat Ali for Respondent No. 1.

Respondent No. 2 in person.

ORDER

The detenu has appeared before me. The bailiff has filed his report. Statements of the detenu as also the S. H. O. have been recorded. It has been indicated by the S. H. O. that a case of theft has been registered in the Thana and-that the detenu was wanted as a suspect. However, he denies that he had detained him for any length of time. He states that be called him on 16th Augusts 1983 and that after some interrogation had let him off.

2. The detenu in his own place says that now, he is free. No further action is needed.

3. Counsel for the petitioner presses for costs as according to him the detenu and his mother were maltreated by the respondent No. 1 S. H. O. It is a question of fact. The allegation is controverted. The broad fact is that a case was registered and the respondent had legal power to call suspects. Stricto sensu, there is no justification to burden him with costs. The petition is filed. Security be refunded to the, petitioner.

S. G. D. Petition filed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Sajawal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.