Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/307/440/148 and 149 bail [murder case] Two people lost their lives in cross cases and two others were injured by the accused party. Along with the suspect, the armed suspect is still not hurting anyone and questions about further liability are required.

1984 P Cr. L J 2271

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.471-B of 1983, decided on 24th April, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/307/440/148 & 149--Bail- [Murder-case]--Cross-cases--Two persons lost lives and other two injured on side of accused party--Accused armed with Sota yet not causing any injury to any one--Question of vicarious liability requiring further inquiry--Bail granted.

Ch. Abdul Sattar Goraya for Petitioner.

Akhtar Masood assisted by M. Sultan Alam for the State.

Date of hearing: 24th April, 1983.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Hussain petitioner in a case under sections 302/307/440/149/148, P.P.C. registered at P.S. Saddar Vehari, vide F.I.R. No. 215/82, dated 10th November, 1982.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and 15 others in furtherance of their common object caused the death of Bashir on 10th November, 1982 in the area of Chak No. 21/W.B. As far the petitioner it has been alleged that duly armed with Sota had accompanied his co-accused who were armed with deadly weapons and remained present throughout the occurrence.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not caused any injury to the deceased or any P.W. and as such is entitled to the concession of bail. The learned counsel for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has, however, opposed this application.

4. After hearing the learned counsel and going through the record I find that there are cross-cases and on the side of the accused party 2 persons have lost lives and 2 have received injuries and that the petitioner although armed with Sota yet he did not cause any injury to anyone. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that tlie7question of the vicarious liability needs further enquiry. He is accordingly allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. /Duty Magistrate, Vehari.

M.Y.H. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Doltala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.