Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SANAULLAH versus STATE


Sections 497 and 498 bail The High Court upheld the applicant's bail through the counsel of the Sessions Court Petitioner, and brought some later facts to the notice of court petition for leave of appeal, however, dismissing the observation that the applicant. You can file another bail application before the High Court. Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)

1983 S C M R 365

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

SANAULLAH AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 102 of 1982, decided on 24th April, 1982.

(Against the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 15‑12‑1981, passed in Crl. Misc. No. 3270‑B/81).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑Ss. 497 & 498‑Bail‑High Court cancelling bail granted to accused‑petitioner by Sessions Court‑Petitioner's counsel bringing certain subsequent facts to notice of Court‑Petition for leave to appeal, however, dismissed with observation that petitioner can file another bail application before High Court on fresh grounds‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).

M. Abdus Salim, Advocate Supreme Court ‑ and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Date of hearing : 24th April, 1.982.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.

‑Sana Ullah and Nazir, petitioners were accused for the offence of abduction of Mst. Ghafooran while Sana Ullah petitioner was also accused of zina with her. Sana Ullah was granted pre‑arrest bail while Nazir was allowed bail after arrest by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad vide order dated 14‑11‑1981. On an application by Abdur Rahman complainant their bail was cancelled by the High Court vide the impugned order.

The accused petitioners now seek Leave to Appeal against the said order.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length we do not consider it proper to interfere with the impugned order. It may, however, be mentioned that the petitioners' counsel brought certain the subsequent facts to, our notice, i.e. statement of Mst. Ghafooran before a Civil Judge in a suit for conjugal rights filed by Sana Ullah against her and that the father of Mst. Ghafooran is persistently refusing to produce he before the Court in a writ of habeas corpus notwithstanding the repeated orders for her production by the High Court. This petition is dismissed with the observation that the petitioners can file another bail application before the High Court on the fresh grounds mentioned above.

Petition dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.