Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 22/R of 1982, decided on 10th October 1982:
(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated 16‑11‑1981. passed in R. S. A. No. 180 of 1981).
‑‑Art. 185 (3) read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908). S. 100 Concurrent finding of fact‑Case standing concluded by concurrent ‑finding of fact by trial Court and First Appellate Court‑High Court on such ground dismissing second appeal of petitioner in limine‑Order of High Court upheld and leave to appeal refused.
Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for‑Respondents.
Date of hearing: 10th October, 1982.
The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the dismissal in limine on 16‑4‑1982 of his R. S. A., by a Single Judge of the Lahore High Court.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone. through the impugned judgment. We are inclined to agree with the view taken by the learned High Court that the case had been concluded by a concurrent finding of fact by the learned Trial Court and the learned First Appellate Court.
The petition is, therefore, dismissed as being without merit.
Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer