Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ELECTRIC CONCERN CORPORATION versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE


Article 9 (1) (a) (i) read with the Customs Act (IV of 1969), in the case of the Section 25A option, a directive is not to accept the value of the goods issued by the customs authorities and to be more than mentioned in the invoice. No reviews. The customs authorities have rejected the offer of the applicants (corporation) to obtain or receive the election goods to the customs authorities for obtaining or not receiving the goods and no direction can be issued to them in this regard.

1983 C L C 1506

[Lahore]

Before Saad Saood Jan, J

MESSRS ELECTRIC CONCERN CORPORATION‑Petitioner

versus

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 4935 of 1982, decided on 22nd December, 1982.

Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)‑

‑‑. Art. 9(1)(a)(i) read with Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 25‑A‑. Direction in matter of option‑Issuance of‑Customs authorities not accepting declared value of consignment and making their own assessment higher than that mentioned in invoice‑Customs authorities declining offer of petitioner (corprution) to acquire consignment‑Held, to acquire goods or not, matter of option with Customs authorities and no direction can be issued to them in this regard.

Ch. Shaukat Ali for Applicant.

ORDER

The petitioner Corporation imported a consignment of enamelled copper wire from Singapur. For the purposes of customs duty and other charges the customs authorities did not accept the declared value of 3,600 per metric ton. but instead made their own assessment which was 1,000 higher than that mentioned in the invoice. The petitioner Corporation preferred an appeal before the Collector and a revision before the Government but with out any success. He has now invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court.

2. It may be mentioned that the petitioner Corporation had made a offer to the customs authorities to acquire his consignment in accordance with the provisions of section 25‑A of the Customs Act. This offer was declined by the customs authorities. In this petition the petitioner Corporation has prayed that a direction be issued to the customs authorities to acquire his goods under section 25‑A of the Customs Act at the declared value.

3. Section 25‑A of the Customs Act reads as follows :‑

"If the appropriate officer finds that the value of the goods declared by the importer in the bill of entry is less than the value determined under section 25, he may, without prejudice to any other action which he may take in respect of the importer of such .goods require the importer to clear the goods on paying the duty on their value determined as aforesaid, or if the importer is unwilling, or fails, to do so, acquire them on behalf of the Federal Government by paying to the importer their value as declared in the bill of entry."

A perusal of this section will show that it is matter of option with the customs authorities to acquire or not to acquire the goods. This being so no direction can be issued to the authorities in this regard. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed in limine.

K. M. A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.