Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus STATE


According to the Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497, Third Bail, Grants Section 497 of the murder case, the two-year legal period stated in the third section, the CRPC trial did not end, the accused, Without any person entitled to guarantee. Other considerations allow for bail

1983 P Cr. L J 1512

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

IFTIKHAR AHMAD-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1850/8 of 1982, decided on 2nd August, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----

------S. 497, proviso third-Bail, grant of-Murder-case-Statutory period of two years as laid down in third proviso to S. 497, Cr. P. C. elapsed yet trial not concluded-Accused, held, entitled to bail irrespective of any other consideration-Bail allowed.

Ch. M hammad Hanif for Petitioner.

Ch. M. Latif for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Iftikhar Ahmad in a case under section 302/307/34, P. P. C., registered at P. S. Baghbanpura, vide F. I. R. No. 464, dated 20th October, 1979.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and his co-accused in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Ghulam Jilani on 30th December, 1979 at 7-30 p. m. in the area of Gujjarpura Road of P. S. Baghbanpura.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 22nd December, 1979 and although the statutory period has elapsed yet the trial has not concluded. The learned counsel for the State has opposed this application on the ground that the petitioner was proclaimed offender and he is also required in other criminal cases. The learned State counsel has however frankly admitted that the delay in the trial has not been caused by the petitioner or by someone else on his behalf.

4. I am of the opinion that speedy trial is a well-recognize right of an accused person and if there is delay specially a statutory] delay then an accused-person irrespective of the fact whether he was absconder or he is required in other cases would be justified in asking for bail. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. .20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Lahore.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.