Section 13 (4) Tenant's request for restoration of tenant occupation was a landlord dispute that the landlord was again in question was accepted by the rent controller for the restoration of the occupation by the tenant's request that the shop be disputed. Date of occupancy was not disclosed The new tenant was unable to prove that the new tenant occupied the premises within two months of the occupation of the landlord, by the tenant. Neither was the rent process nor the registry of the notary public was presented by the tenant in which there was no evidence Was gone In this regard the record of the rental transaction between the landlord and the new tenant is available on record. Reliable and robust evidence was required in this regard, but the witnesses presented by the tenant did not confirm the contents of the tenant's request nor did they support his statement. Landlord and tenant relationship between landlord and allegedly new tenant landlord arising from the defendant's ownership of the Aid Partnership Agreement which proves the partnership business between him and his partner. It was proved that because the landlord had applied without explanation for a long period of time, no time for filing such application was provided in the ordinance but the claim should be made within a reasonable time by the tenant or You were not serious about your claim or were not sure that the landlord's part Approved by the rent controller about the nature of the favorites to retain possession
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
